#Pro tools 12 subscription mod#
#Pro tools 12 subscription update#
#Pro tools 12 subscription pro#

#Pro tools 12 subscription pro#

It seems that Pro tools on the face of it is either taking potential customers for a pack of fools, or they're taking their current customer-base for granted, either that or they're being presumptuous enough to think that their current users are loaded with cash and have no choice but to take the plunge.

#Pro tools 12 subscription update#

But really, this whole half-arsed DAW update trend just makes me sigh with disgust quite frankly. They must think we are all on drugs LOL, either that or they think we have door-mat written on our foreheads ROFL. Steinberg have just pulled the same stunt with Cubase 8. I'm getting a bit tired of these companies that seem like they're trying to pass-off a minor update as a full-fledged major update. also are 'embedded' into the cost of owning a DAW (whichВ can beВ a tough pill to swallow).Д¬ouldn't have put it better myself! My sentiments exactly. The other concern with that is a truly new user not only has to get up to speed, but also learn (in a potentially painful manner) that audio interfaces, MIDI controllers, microphones, monitors, etc. My concern is more for new users, who will evaluate 'what they can do' in X amount of time versus the investment in the same period. Hobbyists are a bit more fickle in this regard, especially if they only use it a couple hours a week (or month). people who make money with it will typicallyВ have no issues to stay current. I even carry a thumb drive with Paint Shop Pro 5 on it to modify pictures on any PC on the fly (it is only 18MB,В does a lot 'as is,' and was written in 1997 (I think)). Office 2007 (or even 2003), Adobe CS 6 (or lower), etc. Examples abound of products that mature to a level that they drive their own price down, and from a software perspective older versions tend to 'do the most useful core functionality' already. I do not think this is as large an issue as people deciding 'what they have' is sufficient. I'm quite happy with 11 and I just don't see what 12 brings that deserves to be considered a major upgrade.Дubdisciple В Many will at least give it a try before jumping to software they most likely liked less than Sonar to begin with. And so far, I haven't got a use for all the cloud stuff.

Not that I care much aout the numbering, since I get all free updates until March 2016, whether their point release or full-fledged upgrades. I remember PT 5 received I don't know how many revisions over the course of 4 years, some including much more significant improvements like Beat Detective and Surround (PT 5.1). Avid certainly jump up versions a lot quicker than they used to. I don't know why they insist on calling it 12. That's a mighty weak feature set for $30.00 a month. (Something that a lot of us have been doing via FTP for years.) That, and a built in front end for their online store where you can easily buy their over priced plugins and never leave your Pro Tools session. So far the features of PT 12 seem to be tools to help you collaborate in the cloud with other musicians.

#Pro tools 12 subscription mod#

Mod Bod Yeah, I'm a bit miffed at the Avid boys.